Offaly retailer challenges 'unreasonable' decision to seize 'firearms-adjacent' imports

placeholder image
tt

A shooting and hiking retailer from outside Tullamore is challenging an 'unreasonable' decision by customs officers to seize "firearms-adjacent" equipmen

A shooting and hiking retailer is challenging an 'unreasonable' decision by customs officers to seize "firearms-adjacent" equipment he had ordered to be shipped to Ireland.

In an ex-parte application at the High Court, where only one side is represented, lawyers for Barry Ryder said the items ordered are gun "chassis", which are not prohibited under relevant legislation and are not essential to the workings of any firearm.

In papers submitted to the High Court, Mr Ryder says he has been subjected to a "sustained campaign of obstruction" of his commercial activities by the "unreasonable and unlawful classification" imposed by customs officers on the items he sought to import.

Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty, granted Mr Ryder permission to challenge the seizure of the equipment by Irish customs officers.

Mr Ryderm of The Heath Screggan, Tullamore, Co Offaly, took his action against the Revenue Commissioners, with the Minister for Justice named as a notice party. Mr Ryder is the owner of Tullamore-based retailer, 'Be Outdoors'.

James B Dwyer SC, instructed by solicitors William Egan & Associates, for Mr Ryder, said his client was seeking orders from the court quashing both the letters of seizure issued in April and the actual seizures of four consignments of equipment as part of his business. Mr Ryder retails a large variety of hiking, camping, cycling, hunting and shooting equipment for those engaged in outdoor recreational activities and pursuits, the court heard.

Mr Dwyer further seeks an order from the court directing the release of the seized gun chassis to Mr Ryder.

Mr Ryder submits he provides ear protectors, gun-cleaning equipment, lamps, magazines, shooting mats, stocks and chassis, in an "extensive product range" and has experienced licensing knowledge.

He set up his business in 2020 and was previously employed by a registered firearms dealer and sports retailer, "in the course of which he was expertly educated in firearms-licensing regulations and legislation".

Mr Ryder submits he has a "full understanding of licensing issues, including importation and exportation of firearms, firearm accessories and essential component parts and non-essential component parts".

The four consignments of chassis parts for firearms were for recreational use only but were, he submits, seized by customs officers without adequate explanation, despite his inquiries.

After years of consistent consultation with the Department of Justice, Mr Ryder says he received "accurate and reliable" advice that included what accessories he could trade under licensing laws.

Mr Ryder also seeks a court declaration that the seized items be returned "forthwith" as there has been no "properly reasoned decision delivered" to him for the "bizarre and contradictory" decisions made in response to his "reasonable questions" over the matters.

Ms Justice Gearty granted the permission to challenge the case and adjourned it to December.

Powered by
Register
Follow us
© 2026 Formpress Publishing LTD. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice