26 Jun 2022

60-year-old man from the midlands must wait to hear outcome of appeal against rape conviction

Drunk driver jailed for two years for crashing into Celbridge taxi

A 60-year-old Midlands man jailed for raping a woman as she slept following a night out must wait to hear the outcome of an appeal against his conviction.

The Laois resident, who can not be named to protect his victim's identity, was convicted by a Central Criminal Court jury following a five day trial in December of anal rape of the 34-year-old woman at her home on October 10, 2010.

Ms Justice Deirdre Murphy sentenced him to seven-and-a-half years imprisonment on February 29, 2016.

The Central Criminal Court heard that the man, who has no previous convictions, did not accept the 10-2 majority verdict of the jury.

He moved to appeal his conviction today, Tuesday, May 2, in the Court of Appeal, where judgment was reserved.

The man's barrister, Patrick Gageby SC, told the three-judge court that the man, then accused, had spoken to a member of his jury at the Luas stop next to the criminal courts building during his trial.

The explanation was that the then accused did not recognise the juror and had simply asked for directions possibly because his car was parked at the Red Cow Park + Ride.

If the trial judge was inclined not to discharge the jury, Mr Gageby said, it behoved her to make further enquiries of the jury or individual juror.

Mr Gageby said at a minimum, as a question of caution, if there has been a form of contact between the accused and a jury person, there must be a pointed enquiry of the juror as to whether he or she can pursue their judicial function as a juror and whether the contact caused an apprehension in the mind of the juror. But that wasn't done in this case, Mr Gageby submitted.

The test was whether a reasonable person had a reasonable apprehension that the accused did not get a fair trial, Mr Gageby said. 

Counsel for the Director of Public Prosecutions, Remy Farrell SC, said it was an “innocuous approach.”

Mr Farrell said trial judges instruct jury's not to have regard to material on the internet and nobody has ever contended that it was necessary to go a step further and ask jurors whether they had complied with that direction.

He said it was the universal experience in Irish courts that jury members comply with directions.

Mr Justice Alan Mahon, who sat with Mr Justice John Edwards and Mr Justice John Hedigan, said the three-judge court would reserve its judgment.

To continue reading this article for FREE,
please kindly register and/or log in.

Registration is absolutely 100% FREE and will help us personalise your experience on our sites. You can also sign up to our carefully curated newsletter(s) to keep up to date with your latest local news!

Register / Login

Buy the e-paper of the Donegal Democrat, Donegal People's Press, Donegal Post and Inish Times here for instant access to Donegal's premier news titles.

Keep up with the latest news from Donegal with our daily newsletter featuring the most important stories of the day delivered to your inbox every evening at 5pm.